Our Notable Cases
Setting legal precedents and securing high-stakes commercial victories across regional and international courts.
Litigation
At KBH, we understand that litigation can be costly and time-consuming, which is why we encourage our clients to explore alternative dispute resolution options whenever possible…
Arbitration
KBH has extensive experienced acting on arbitrations before the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), and the DIFC-LCIA which has now been transferred to DIAC…
Corporate Commercial
KBH offers a comprehensive range of services to clients who require corporate and commercial advice in relation to all legal aspects of doing business in the DIFC, UAE and the wider…
Wills & Legacy Planning
At KBH, we provide expert services to help you draft and register wills and trusts, plan for succession and probate, and manage private estates for both UAE Nationals and Expatriates…
Commercial Litigation in the DIFC Courts
William Allan Jones (2) Coffee Planet LLC (3) Coffee Planet Roastery FZE v Robert Anthony Jones [2022] DIFC CFI 043
William Allan Jones (2) Coffee Planet LLC (3) Coffee Planet Roastery FZE v Robert Anthony Jones [2022] DIFC CFI 043
KBH represented the Defendant in a family dispute. The Defendant was the subject of a freezing and injunction order where there were extant proceedings in the Dubai Courts. The case was the first to consider the DIFC Courts’ jurisdiction where there are ongoing proceedings in the Dubai Courts as well as the DIFC Courts’ power to grant a Black Swan injunction.
Click here for the full judgment
Sanjeev Sawhney (2) Alka Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2022] DIFC CFI 062
Sanjeev Sawhney (2) Alka Sawhney v Credit Suisse AG [2022] DIFC CFI 062
KBH is representing the Claimants in a financial mis-selling case. The proceedings are at the early stages. KBH has successfully defended a strike out and immediate judgment application. The judgment is the first reported case to consider whether the limitation period of 6 years, as set out in the Article 38 of the Court Law No. 10 of 2004 contains an exception for fraud in every case, or only in cases where the applicable law expressly provides that the limitation period will be suspended or extended to run from the date of knowledge in cases where fraud is alleged.
Click here for the full judgment
(1) Gate Mena DMCC (formerly known as Huobi OTC DMCC) (2) Huobi Mena FZE vs (1) Tabarak Investment Capital Limited (2) Christian Thurner [2020] DIFC TCD 001 (26 October 2022)
(1) Gate Mena DMCC (formerly known as Huobi OTC DMCC) (2) Huobi Mena FZE vs (1) Tabarak Investment Capital Limited (2) Christian Thurner [2020] DIFC TCD 001 (26 October 2022)
KBH successfully represented the First Defendant in the first cryptocurrency case in the Technology and Construction Division of the DIFC Courts. The claim related to the transfer and storage of bitcoins and the DIFC Courts determined (in line with other common law jurisdictions) that Bitcoins are (tangible) property. It is one of the few cases in the world that addresses the issue of safe transfer of cryptocurrency between the buyer and seller and the obligations owed to a custodian of the cryptocurrency. The case highlighted the importance of digital asset disputes in the DIFC Courts, and in December 2022 the DIFC Courts unveiled the launch of a new set of industry-first specialised rules for its newly formed Digital Economy Court Division.
KBH continued to represent the First Defendant in the DIFC Court of Appeal.
Click here for the full judgment
Union Bank of India (DIFC Branch) v (1) Velocity Industries LLC (2) Velocity Venture Limited (3) Umaku Trade Invest Limited (4) Vijey Kapoor (5) Ravi Kuchimanchi (6) Rajinder Makhijani (7) Parag Gupta (8) Devika Makhijani [2020] DIFC CFI 025
Union Bank of India (DIFC Branch) v (1) Velocity Industries LLC (2) Velocity Venture Limited (3) Umaku Trade Invest Limited (4) Vijey Kapoor (5) Ravi Kuchimanchi (6) Rajinder Makhijani (7) Parag Gupta (8) Devika Makhijani [2020] DIFC CFI 025
KBH successfully represented the Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Defendants in a claim pursuant to alleged obligations under personal guarantees.
Click here for the full judgment.
Iron Mountain Records Management DWC-LLC v Kinmere DWC-LLC [2020] DIFC CFI 123
Iron Mountain Records Management DWC-LLC v Kinmere DWC-LLC [2020] DIFC CFI 123
Tempo Events Management vs Envie Events LLC FZ [2019] DIFC CFI 020
Tempo Events Management vs Envie Events LLC FZ [2019] DIFC CFI 020
KBH acted on behalf of the Defendant in successfully applying for a security for costs order.
KBC Aldini Capital Limited v (1) David Baazov (2) Canaccord Genuity Corp (3) Canaccord Genuity (Dubai) Limited and (1) Aleksei Chegodaev (2) Ferdyne Advisory Inc [2017] DIFC CFI 002
KBC Aldini Capital Limited v (1) David Baazov (2) Canaccord Genuity Corp (3) Canaccord Genuity (Dubai) Limited and (1) Aleksei Chegodaev (2) Ferdyne Advisory Inc [2017] DIFC CFI 002
KBH acted for the Claimant against the owner of the world’s largest online gambling company and its financial advisers, relating to equity commitment letters filed in support of a private bid to acquire a global internet gaming company, Amaya Inc.
Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala v (1) Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair (2) Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath (3) RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC [2017] DIFC CFI 037
Ilyas Gaffar Saboowala v (1) Soman Kuniyath Kunjunni Nair (2) Mini Soman Thoruvil Veluthedath (3) RAG Foodstuff Trading LLC [2017] DIFC CFI 037
KBH acted for the Defendants in successfully discharging an injunction before former Deputy Chief Justice Sir David Steel, in a claim for damages arising from a breach of warranty.
Click here for the full judgment
Mr Amit Dattani (2) Mr Nitin Jobanputra (3) Mr Masood UR Rahman (4) Mr Shemhon Iftakhar v Damac Park Towers Company Limited [2014]
Mr Amit Dattani (2) Mr Nitin Jobanputra (3) Mr Masood UR Rahman (4) Mr Shemhon Iftakhar v Damac Park Towers Company Limited [2014]
KBH acted for the Claimants in proceedings before the former Chief Justice Michael Hwang, former Judicial Commissioner of the Supreme Court of Singapore, in a claim involving a breach and subsequent termination of an SPA in the absence of a contractual termination clause in the SPA.
GFH Capital Limited v David Lawrence Haigh [2014] DIFC CFI 020
GFH Capital Limited v David Lawrence Haigh [2014] DIFC CFI 020
KBH acted for the Respondent at the return date hearing, pro-bono, in respect of an application for a freezing injunction and search order before the former DCJ Sir John Chadwick.
Click here for the full judgment
Youssef Issa Ward v DAMAC Park Towers Company Limited [2014] DIFC CFI 001
Youssef Issa Ward v DAMAC Park Towers Company Limited [2014] DIFC CFI 001
KBH acted for the Claimant in a claim arising out of a Reservation Agreement for an off-plan purchase of a unit in the Park Towers Development within the DIFC.
Click here for the full judgment
Suhail Raza Badami v DAMAN Real Estate Capital Partners Limited [2013] DIFC CFI 003
Suhail Raza Badami v DAMAN Real Estate Capital Partners Limited [2013] DIFC CFI 003
KBH acted for the Claimant in respect of a claim for the breach of an SPA and the enforceability of a force majeure clause.
Corinth Pipeworks SA Barclays Bank Plc v (1) Afras Ltd (2) Radhakrishnan Kumar [2010] DIFC CFI 024 (12 January 2015)
Corinth Pipeworks SA Barclays Bank Plc v (1) Afras Ltd (2) Radhakrishnan Kumar [2010] DIFC CFI 024 (12 January 2015)
KBH acted for the Second and Third Defendants in respect of a breach of a services contract, before the former Deputy Chief Justice of the DIFC Courts, Sir David Steel, former Judge of the Commercial and Admiralty Courts, England & Wales and the former Chairman of the European Commercial Judges Forum.
This case developed important aspects of DIFC law including the jurisdiction of the DIFC courts and the DIFC’s law of obligations (Article 56 of DIFC Law No. 5 of 2005.)
Click here for the full judgment
(1) Mr Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi (2) Mrs Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad (3) Mrs Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai v (1) Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited (2) Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd [2009] DIFC CFI 026 (21 August 2014)
(1) Mr Rafed Abdel Mohsen Bader Al Khorafi (2) Mrs Amrah Ali Abdel Latif Al Hamad (3) Mrs Alia Mohamed Sulaiman Al Rifai v (1) Bank Sarasin-Alpen (ME) Limited (2) Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd [2009] DIFC CFI 026 (21 August 2014)
KBH acted for the Claimants in the largest financial mis-selling case in the GCC region before the former Deputy Chief Justice of the DIFC Courts, Sir John Chadwick, formerly the Lord Justice of Appeal in England & Wales.
This case remains one of the most ground-breaking cases in the DIFC which developed the law in multiples areas including matters of jurisdiction and costs.
Click here for the full judgment
(1) Orion Holdings Overseas Ltd (2) Orion Global Financial Services LLC (3) Orion Capital Ltd v. (1) Mohammed Abdel Khaleq Mohammad (2) Nidal Abdel Khaleq Mohammad (3) Privatbank Ihag Zurich AG [2015] DIFC CFI 033 (8 February 2018)
(1) Orion Holdings Overseas Ltd (2) Orion Global Financial Services LLC (3) Orion Capital Ltd v. (1) Mohammed Abdel Khaleq Mohammad (2) Nidal Abdel Khaleq Mohammad (3) Privatbank Ihag Zurich AG [2015] DIFC CFI 033 (8 February 2018)
KBH acted on behalf of a liquidator of various DIFC and US companies in successfully resisting a jurisdiction challenge brought by a Swiss bank in resisting claims by the liquidators to have certain pledges made by fraudulent directors declared invalid as well as subsequent enforcement proceedings against the Bank in Switzerland.
Click here for the full judgment
Commercial Litigation in the English High Court
CL-2020-000211(1) Njord Partners SMA-Seal LP (2) NPSSF Debt Co S.A.R.L. (3) AIE III
CL-2020-000211(1) Njord Partners SMA-Seal LP (2) NPSSF Debt Co S.A.R.L. (3) AIE III
KBH acted for the Defendants in seeking a declaration as to the applicability of the Treaty between UK and UAE on Judicial Assistance. In addition, KBH represented the Second Defendant in a Part 71 application.
Click here for the full judgment
Lalit Modi v Christopher Cairns [2014]
Lalit Modi v Christopher Cairns [2014]
Instructed on behalf of the Claimant in proceedings in the High Court in London in one of the highest priced match-fixing cases in cricket.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/cairns-v-modi-judgment.pdf
Employment litigation in the DIFC
Paramjit Kahlon v Liberty Steel Group Limited [2022] DIFC CFI 070
Paramjit Kahlon v Liberty Steel Group Limited [2022] DIFC CFI 070
KBH acts for a leading mining executive in a claim for $30m of lost bonus, and successfully defended a jurisdiction challenge.
Shiraz Zeyd Sethi v SWF Middle East LLP [2021] DIFC CFI 064
Shiraz Zeyd Sethi v SWF Middle East LLP [2021] DIFC CFI 064
KBH acted for for the Managing Partner of DWF in relation to a contractual claim.
TP ICAP Group Services Limited v (1) GMG (Dubai) Limited (2) Opeyemi Olayanju [2020] DIFC CFI 021
TP ICAP Group Services Limited v (1) GMG (Dubai) Limited (2) Opeyemi Olayanju [2020] DIFC CFI 021
KBH acted for the Defendants in claims brought by a former employer in the UK for procuring a breach and a breach of contract/injunctive relief against its former broker. Despite the fact that the contract was governed by a UK jurisdiction clause, the DIFC courts seized jurisdiction on the basis that the new employer was located in the DIFC, and the DIFC Court was able to apply UK law as a foreign law. The matter was listed for a two week hearing at the end of 2020 but settled.
Christos Papadopoulos v Standard Chartered Bank [2017] DIFC CFI 004
Christos Papadopoulos v Standard Chartered Bank [2017] DIFC CFI 004
KBH acted for the former Regional Chief Executive, of SCB, Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan in respect of his claim for breach of a settlement agreement in respect of a future bonus payment.
Asif Hakim Adil v Frontline Development Partners Limited [2014] DIFC CFI 015 (3 April 2016) On appeal: Frontline Development Partners Limited v Asif Hakim Adil [2015] DIFC CA 005 (15 September 2015)
KBH acted for the Claimant in his claim for termination benefits. Setting a precedent on the applicability of a penalty payment under Article 18(2) of the old Employment Law, where the employers failed to pay the employee’s termination entitlements within 14 days. The Court of Appeal affirmed the construction of Article 18(2), which resulted in a change of the law.
Click here for the full judgment
Ozan Kalemdaroglu v GMG (Dubai) Limited [2016] DIFC CFI 046
KBH actedfor the Defendant in a successful application for security for costs against a former employer
1. Raul Silva v United Investment Bank [2014] DIFC CA 004
Bushra Ahmed (instructed by Stephenson Harwood (Middle East) LLP acted for the Respondent before the DIFC Court of Appeal as to the test for ‘reasonable employer’ under the old DIFC Employment Law.
Sonia Guetat v Mirabaud (Middle East) Limited [2014] DIFC CFI 004
KBH acted for a pregnant employee in relation to claims of discrimination.
Mustafa Al-Hendi v Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE) Limited [2012] DIFC CFI 026(17 April 2013)
KBH acted for the Claimant in respect of a breach of an employment contract.
Click here for the full judgment
Aida Dagher v Capital Investment International (CII-UAE) Ltd [2011] DIFC CFI 013 (30 June 2014)
KBH acted for the employee in relation to what amounts to a ‘reasonable employer’ under Article 59A of the DIFC Employment Law.
Arbitration Proceedings
- Acted for the Respondent in an ICC arbitration in respect of a marine construction dispute.
- Acted for the Respondent in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration in respect of an option agreement as well as defending an injunction and freezing order obtained in the DIFC Courts in aid of the arbitration.
- Acted for the Claimant in a DIAC arbitration claim for damages involving breaches arising out of a franchise agreement with a Saudi entity.
- Acted for the Respondent in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration in relation to breach of a litigation funding agreement.
- Acted for the Clamant in an ICC arbitration dealing with breach under an SPA and the failure by the developer to hand over by the anticipated completion date.
- Acted for a Claimant in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration dealing with issues relating to the notice provisions in the DIFC Real Property Law, as well as the cure provisions provided for in Article 80 of the DIFC Contract Law.
- Acting for the Claimant in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration in connection with the recovery of USD 25 million from the borrower (together with those individuals and entities who had guaranteed the borrower’s liability) under a credit facility agreement. Concurrent possession proceedings were commenced in the UK against a residential property used as security.
- Acting for the Respondent in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration in connection with a distributor agreement.
- Acted for the Respondents in respect of USD 180 million DIFC-LCIA arbitration concerning a Shareholders Agreement as well as an option agreement with a time of the essence clause.
- Advising in a third-party disclosure exercise in a DIFC-LCIA a
- Acted for the Claimant in an ICC arbitration, under a provision for services contract relating to an infrastructure project in Pakistan. The seat of the arbitration was Paris, and French law was applicable.
- Instructed in an ad-hoc DIFC-LCIA arbitration in Bahrain under the FIDIC Silver Book.
- Acting for the Claimant in successfully obtaining a worldwide freezing order in the DIFC Courts to freeze assets up to USD 80 million to secure an Indian arbitral award that was to be enforced in the DIFC and Dubai Courts.
- Acting for a Claimant bank in a DIFC-LCIA arbitration in relation to a facility in the sum of USD 25,000,000. Commenced possession proceedings in the UK in relation to security under personal guarantees, which was stayed following a hearing in the High Court, and in respect of the enforceability of an arbitration agreement in the facility agreement.
- Representing in an ICC arbitration in respect of an issue of contractual interpretation under French Law, and the application of the French Civil Code and European Agency Law.
Advisory work
Commercial Advisory Work
- Advised a high-net-worth individual in respect of being sold leveraged, and highly risky, bespoke investment products, against an international investment bank.
- Advised minority shareholders in respect of a complex shareholder dispute.
- Advised a DIFC liquidator in respect of DIFC liquidations.
- Advised a group of investors onshore in respect of mis-selling of investments.
- Instructed by a Singaporean law firm to provide an expert report on DIFC Regulatory Law in relation to financial mis-selling proceedings in the Singapore Court.
- Acted for a Private Equity Fund in the DIFC in the Financial Markets Tribunal, dealing with multi- jurisdictional issues across the Cayman Islands and onshore Dubai, dealing with issues in respect of the Regulatory Law, Collective Investment Law, COB Rules, GEN Rules, touching on issues of misconduct, integrity and fitness to practice of an Authorised Individual.
- Advised and representing a company in breach of the UAE Financial Regulatory Law and the Dubai Financial Services Authority Rules.
- Advised an UHNWI as an exiting shareholder in respect of his exit from a billion-dollar GCC company.
Advisory work
- Acted for a compliance officer of a swiss bank in his claim for religious discrimination which he was subjected to when he converted from Christianity to Islam.
- Advised on a team move from one of the largest trading houses which was fought in the High Court in London with claims for breach of contract, injunctive relief and constructive unfair dismissal.
- Advised a female senior banker of a large international bank in relation to her exit strategy and possible claims for breach of contract
- Advised a senior executive of a major conglomerate in respect of the enforceability of his terms of employment.
- Advised a senior employee of an international bank in relation to claims against against the bank.
- Advised a high-profile employee in relation to his redundancy package offered in the UAE, considering the fact that the laws of England and Wales governed his employment contract.
- Advised a senior and highly-regarded banking executive in the UAE in relation to the termination of his employment without warning and with a very modest redundancy package.
- Advised a former employee in relation to his end of service entitlements pursuant to UAE Labour Law.
- Acted for a senior partner in an extremely confidential and highly sensitive matter, negotiating his exit from an international law firm.
- Acted for senior counsel in a very sensitive and highly confidential case, concerning discrimination on the grounds of gender and being subjected to discriminatory conduct by the management team.
- Advised a client in respect of his end of service entitlements and post-termination restrictive covenants along with his options for settlement or pursuing a potential claim in the DIFC Courts.
- Advised a former Business Head and Accountant in relation to his end of service benefits and payments due under his employment agreement and payments arising out of a settlement agreement.
- Advised a high-net-worth individual in respect of his exit arrangements from a large investment fund.
- 14. Advised an employee in respect of his duties as an employee pursuant to a Dubai Financial Services Authority investigation.
- Advised a former Senior Executive at a Private Equity and Global Investment Company in respect of discrimination on the grounds of age and being subjected to discriminatory conduct by the company.
- Acted for a senior female Emirati employee of an international bank, in respect of claims for discrimination, pursuant to which a pre-action disclosure application was pursued for information relating to the practices of the bank in promoting Emirati Women.
- Acted for a government entity in respect of an employment dispute.
- Acted for the compliance officer of a leading financial institution in a claim for whistleblowing and discrimination.